RE: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:59:04 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <20230301235646.2692846-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
References: <20230301235646.2692846-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20230301235646.2692846-5-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 7:57 AM
> 
> We’re not using  spinlock-protected IOASID allocation anymore, there’s
> no need for GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/6] Remove VT-d virtual command interface and IOASID
  - From: Jacob Pan
- [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation
  - From: Jacob Pan

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/sva: Stop using ioasid_set for SVA
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] iommu/ioasid: Rename INVALID_IOASID
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [Linux for Samsung SOC] [eCos] [Linux PCI] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites]

Powered by Linux