Hi Martin, On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:45 PM Martin Tůma <tumic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21. 02. 23 14:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > No platform dependencies at all, while this is a platform driver that > > relies on some other not-yet-existing driver creating an "xdma" > > platform device? > > There is at least one "already-existing" driver based on this driver > that is waiting in the v4l2 queue for xdma - our MGB4 driver: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20230207150119.5542-2-tumic@xxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks for the link! As VIDEO_MGB4 selects XILINX_XDMA, perhaps XILINX_XDMA can be made invisible, unless compile-testing? config XILINX_XDMA tristate "Xilinx DMA/Bridge Subsystem DMA Engine" if COMPILE_TEST Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
