Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: fsl-mxs-dma: Convert MXS DMA to DT schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/12/2022 20:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/18/22 19:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/12/2022 00:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 12/17/22 12:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>> +  - $ref: dma-controller.yaml#
>>>>> +  - if:
>>>>> +      properties:
>>>>> +        compatible:
>>>>> +          not:
>>>>
>>>> I think "not:" goes just after "if:". Please double check that it's correct.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway it is easier to have this without negation and you already
>>>> enumerate all variants (here and below).
>>>
>>> About this part, I don't think that works. See this:
>>>
>>> $ git grep -A 15 'imx2[38]-dma-apb[hx]' arch/ | grep
>>> '\(imx2[38]-dma-apb[hx]\|dma-channels\)'
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx23-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi- dma-channels = <8>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx23-dma-apbx";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx28-dma-apbx";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6q-dma-apbh",
>>> "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-dma-apbh",
>>> "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6q-dma-apbh",
>>> "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh",
>>> "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi: compatible =
>>> "fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh", "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi: compatible =
>>> "fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh", "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
>>>
>>> So I think what we have to do to validate that, is, say
>>>
>>> default: 4
>>>
>>> if does not match on 6q/6sx/7d/23-apbx/28-abbh/28-apbx then 8
>>>
>>> if does not match on 6q/6sx/7d/23-apbh then 16
>>>
>>> But if there is a better way to validate the above, please do tell.
>>
>> Then your existing if:then: is also not correct because you require for
>> fsl,imx28-dma-apbh (as it is not in second if:then:) const:16. Just
>> don't require it.
> 
> So, shall I just drop the entire allOf: section ?

No, what about the interrupts?

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux