2022-07-29 at 22:09, Peter Rosin wrote: > 2022-07-28 at 10:39, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Looks like I've already caught an oops in at-hdmac driver when not using virt-dma, >> see below. Would you please test with all the patches from [2] instead of just >> using the patch from [1]? I've run stress tests over night by using [2] and >> everything went fine on my side. >> >> Cheers, >> ta >> >> [2] To github.com:ambarus/linux-0day.git >> * [new branch] at-hdmac-virt-dma-2nd-iteration -> at-hdmac-virt-dma-2nd-iteration > > Hi Tudor, > > This last one feels very promising! It's been running for a few hours without > incidents, so even if it isn't fixed it's several magnitudes better. > > I'll leave it running for the night. Fingers crossed... Reporting that it's still all good and that I think it's time to declare victory. Thanks a bunch for you effort! Looking through the patches on that branch, I suspect not all of it will be submitted upstream in that exact form. Please let me know when you have a cleaned up series so that I can retest and add some tested-by tags to. Cheers and thanks again, Peter
