On 12/07/2022 17:54, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 11/07/2022 00:21, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> On 7/11/22 04:39, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Damien, Krzysztof, >>> >>> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that >>> long, but this binding is (functionally) unchanged for a few >>> versions now. Are you happy with this approach Damien? >>> U-Boot only cares about the compatible & the clocks property, >>> not the regs etc. >>> >>> I (lazily) tested it in U-Boot with the following diff: >> >> If both the kernel and u-boot still work as expected with this change, I >> am OK with it. > > It's all yours so Krzysztof :) It's too late in the cycle for me to pick it up. If you have alternate tree to take it through, go ahead with: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Otherwise, I'll take it after the merge window of v5.20, so in ~1 month according to crystal ball. Best regards, Krzysztof
