On 01/06/2022 14:00, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> of_find_device_by_node() takes reference, we should use put_device()
> to release it when not need anymore.
adding a new label and using goto would be another option or even better?
> Fixes: a074ae38f859 ("dmaengine: Add driver for TI DMA crossbar on DRA7x")
> Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> - split v1 into two patches.
> v1 link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512051815.11946-1-linmq006@xxxxxxxxx
> ---
> drivers/dma/ti/dma-crossbar.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti/dma-crossbar.c
> index 71d24fc07c00..06da13b18a7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/dma-crossbar.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/dma-crossbar.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void *ti_dra7_xbar_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> if (dma_spec->args[0] >= xbar->xbar_requests) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid XBAR request number: %d\n",
> dma_spec->args[0]);
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> @@ -252,12 +253,14 @@ static void *ti_dra7_xbar_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> dma_spec->np = of_parse_phandle(ofdma->of_node, "dma-masters", 0);
> if (!dma_spec->np) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get DMA master\n");
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!map) {
> of_node_put(dma_spec->np);
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> @@ -268,6 +271,7 @@ static void *ti_dra7_xbar_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> mutex_unlock(&xbar->mutex);
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Run out of free DMA requests\n");
> kfree(map);
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
this will not apply with the other patch going separately...
Can you send a two patch series?
While there, I would check if labels+goto would look better?
Thanks for finding these and fixing it!
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
> set_bit(map->xbar_out, xbar->dma_inuse);
--
Péter
