On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:02 PM Allen Pais <apais@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[note: something is wrong with your email client, your previous reply appears to
be in HTML]
> > That is a good idea, lot of drivers are waiting for completion which can
> > be signalled from hardirq, this would also reduce the hops we have and
> > help improve latency a bit. On the downside, some controllers provide
> > error information, which would need to be dealt with.
>
>
> I am not an expert in dma subsystem, but by using completion from
> Hardirq context be a concern? Especially with latency.
I don't see how: to the task waiting for the completion, there should
be no difference, and for the irq handler sending it, it just avoids
a few cycles going into softirq context.
> > Yes that would be a very reasonable mechanism, thanks for the
> > suggestions.
>
> I have started working on the idea of global softirq. A RFC should be ready
> For review soon.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
