Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: altera-msgdma: correct mutex locking order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 08:23:06PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> The order of spin_unlock and spin_lock seems wrong. Correct it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Get rid of dirty index problem due to the patch being manually editted.
> 
>  drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c b/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> index 6f56dfd375e3..e35096c12abc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> @@ -591,9 +591,9 @@ static void msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup(struct msgdma_device *mdev)
>  
>  		dmaengine_desc_get_callback(&desc->async_tx, &cb);
>  		if (dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(&cb)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&mdev->lock);
> -			dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(&cb, NULL);
>  			spin_lock(&mdev->lock);
> +			dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(&cb, NULL);
> +			spin_unlock(&mdev->lock);
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Run any dependencies, then free the descriptor */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
Hello,

the lock is first grabbed in msgdma_tasklet.

Kr,

Olivier



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux