Hi Jason, On Tue, 24 May 2022 10:50:34 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > > DMA requests tagged with PASID can target individual IOMMU domains. > > Introduce a domain-wide PASID for DMA API, it will be used on the same > > mapping as legacy DMA without PASID. Let it be IOVA or PA in case of > > identity domain. > > Huh? I can't understand what this is trying to say or why this patch > makes sense. > > We really should not have pasid's like this attached to the domains.. > This is the same "DMA API global PASID" you reviewed in v3, I just singled it out as a standalone patch and renamed it. Here is your previous review comment. > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h > @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ struct iommu_domain { > enum iommu_page_response_code (*iopf_handler)(struct iommu_fault *fault, > void *data); > void *fault_data; > + ioasid_t pasid; /* Used for DMA requests with PASID */ > + atomic_t pasid_users; These are poorly named, this is really the DMA API global PASID and shouldn't be used for other things. Perhaps I misunderstood, do you mind explaining more? Thanks, Jacob