Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年4月19日 週二 下午6:59寫道： > > On 19/04/2022 12:57, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>> Not sure that this one is actually needed Krzysztof, Zong Li has a fix > >>> for this in his series of fixes for the sifive pdma: > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/edd72c0cca1ebceddc032ff6ec2284e3f48c5ad3.1648461096.git.zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx/ > >>> > >>> Maybe you could add your review to his version? > >> > >> Zong's Li patch was sent 10 days after my patch... [1] Why riscv DTS > >> patches take so much time to pick up? > >> > > > > Oh, my bad. I incorrectly assumed that that patch was present before v8, > > I should've checked further back - sorry! > > No problem :) > > I don't mind Zong's patch to be taken although in general I believe more > in FIFO (or FIF Served) style. > Hi all, Thanks Conor brings me here. The patch 1 and 4 in my series has been applied into dmaengine/next, but patch 2 and 3 should go by riscv tree, so I guess that I could re-send the patch 2 based on top of Krzysztof's patch, then let's drop the patch 2 & 3 of another patchset. I will keep follow up here. Thanks all. > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
