> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 8:48 PM
> To: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Koul
> <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Helgaas
> <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>; Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Serge Semin
> <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>; Alexey Malahov
> <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pavel Parkhomenko
> <Pavel.Parkhomenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof
> Wilczyński <kw@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH 01/25] dmaengine: dw-edma: Drop
> dma_slave_config.direction field usage
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> The dma_slave_config.direction field usage in the DW eDMA driver has been
> introduced in the commit bd96f1b2f43a ("dmaengine: dw-edma: support local
> dma device transfer semantics"). Mainly the change introduced there was
> correct (indeed DEV_TO_MEM means using RD-channel and MEM_TO_DEV -
> WR-channel for the case of having eDMA accessed locally from
> CPU/Application side), but providing an additional
> MEM_TO_MEM/DEV_TO_DEV-based semantics was quite redundant if not to say
> potentially harmful (when it comes to removing the denoted field). First
> of all since the dma_slave_config.direction field has been marked as
> obsolete (see [1] and the structure dc [2]) and will be discarded in
> future, using it especially in a non-standard way is discouraged. Secondly
> in accordance with the commit denoted above the default
> dw_edma_device_transfer() semantics has been changed despite what it's
> message said. So claiming that the method was left backward compatible was
> wrong.
>
> Anyway let's fix the problems denoted above and simplify the
> dw_edma_device_transfer() method by dropping the parsing of the
> DMA-channel direction field. Instead of having that implicit
> dma_slave_config.direction field semantic we can use the recently added
> DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL flag to distinguish between the local and remote DW
> eDMA setups thus preserving both cases support. In addition to that an
> ASCII-figure has been added to clarify the complication out.
>
> [1] Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst
> [2] include/linux/dmaengine.h: dma_slave_config.direction
>
> Co-developed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> In accordance with agreement with Frank and Manivannan this patch is
> supposed to be moved to the series:
> Link:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kern
> el.org%2Fdmaengine%2F20220310192457.3090-1-
> Frank.Li%40nxp.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7CFrank.Li%40nxp.com%7C4918ae8545e94
> ab137dc08da0d386b3f%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6378368332
> 30354384%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTi
> I6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ejkihPy4A5spPj%2BcCgZgheZXdWdnvRQ
> 52SOE0wtDqMI%3D&reserved=0
> in place of the patch:
> [PATCH v5 6/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction"
> member
> Link:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kern
> el.org%2Fdmaengine%2F20220310192457.3090-7-
> Frank.Li%40nxp.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7CFrank.Li%40nxp.com%7C4918ae8545e94
> ab137dc08da0d386b3f%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6378368332
> 30354384%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTi
> I6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=qedpXrMGAR9frJWydd9Q63hZDHTYf%2BE
> ScsHfIx9019M%3D&reserved=0
> ---
Did you have extern git, so I can pull patch from it. Our Email server
change patch's format, which cause git am failure and https://patchwork.kernel.org/ still
have not this patches yet, or send two patches as attachment to me .
Best regards
Frank Li
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-
> edma-core.c
> index 5be8a5944714..e9e32ed74aa9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> @@ -339,21 +339,40 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> if (!chan->configured)
> return NULL;
>
> - switch (chan->config.direction) {
> - case DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: /* local DMA */
> - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
> - break;
> - return NULL;
> - case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: /* local DMA */
> - if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
> - break;
> - return NULL;
> - default: /* remote DMA */
> - if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
> - break;
> - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
> - break;
> - return NULL;
> + /*
> + * Local Root Port/End-point Remote End-point
> + * +-----------------------+ PCIe bus +----------------------+
> + * | | +-+ | |
> + * | DEV_TO_MEM Rx Ch <----+ +---+ Tx Ch DEV_TO_MEM |
> + * | | | | | |
> + * | MEM_TO_DEV Tx Ch +----+ +---> Rx Ch MEM_TO_DEV |
> + * | | +-+ | |
> + * +-----------------------+ +----------------------+
> + *
> + * 1. Normal logic:
> + * If eDMA is embedded into the DW PCIe RP/EP and controlled from
> the
> + * CPU/Application side, the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) will be
> used
> + * for the device read operations (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Tx channel
> + * (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) - for the write operations (MEM_TO_DEV).
> + *
> + * 2. Inverted logic:
> + * If eDMA is embedded into a Remote PCIe EP and is controlled by
> the
> + * MWr/MRd TLPs sent from the CPU's PCIe host controller, the Tx
> + * channel (EDMA_DIR_WRITE) will be used for the device read
> operations
> + * (DEV_TO_MEM) and the Rx channel (EDMA_DIR_READ) - for the write
> + * operations (MEM_TO_DEV).
> + *
> + * It is the client driver responsibility to choose a proper
> channel
> + * for the DMA transfers.
> + */
> + if (chan->dw->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL) {
> + if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
> ||
> + (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV))
> + return NULL;
> + } else {
> + if ((chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE && dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM)
> ||
> + (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV))
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_CYCLIC) {
> --
> 2.35.1
