Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction" member

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 08:52:25PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:11:59PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 08:29:30PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:12:02PM -0600, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > The "direction" member of the "dma_slave_config" structure is deprecated.
> > > > The clients no longer use this field to specify the direction of the slave
> > > > channel. But in the eDMA core, this field is used to differentiate between the
> > > > Root complex (remote) and Endpoint (local) DMA accesses.
> > > > 
> > > > Nevertheless, we can't differentiate between local and remote accesses without
> > > > a dedicated flag. So let's get rid of the old check and add a new check for
> > > > verifying the DMA operation between local and remote memory instead.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > no chang between v1 to v4
> > > >  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 17 ++---------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > > index 507f08db1aad3..47c6a52929fcd 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > > @@ -341,22 +341,9 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> > > >  	if (!chan->configured)
> > > >  		return NULL;
> > > >  
> > > > -	switch (chan->config.direction) {
> > > > -	case DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: /* local DMA */
> > > > -		if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
> > > > -			break;
> > > > -		return NULL;
> > > > -	case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: /* local DMA */
> > > > -		if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
> > > > -			break;
> > > 
> > > > +	/* eDMA supports only read and write between local and remote memory */
> > > 
> > > The comment is a bit confusing because both cases are named as
> > > "memory" while the permitted directions contains DEV-part, which
> > > means "device". What I would suggest to write here is something like:
> > > "DW eDMA supports transferring data from/to the CPU/Application memory
> > > to/from the PCIe link partner device by injecting the PCIe MWr/MRd TLPs."
> > > 
> > 
> 
> > End of the day, you'd be transferring data between remote and local memory
> > only and the terms (local and remote) are also used in the databook. So I think
> > the comment is fine.
> 
> Yes, but the databook either adds a note regarding what memory it is
> or it can be inferred from the text context. So at least it would be
> appropriate to preserve the notes here two:
> "eDMA supports only read and write between local (CPU/application) and
> remote (PCIe/link partner) memory." Otherwise it's hard to understand
> what memory the comment states about.
> 

Okay, I'm fine with this.

"eDMA supports only read and write between local (CPU/application) and
remote (PCIe/link partner) memory."

Thanks,
Mani

> -Sergey
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > > -Sergey
> > > 
> > > > +	if (dir != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && dir != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
> > > >  		return NULL;
> > > > -	default: /* remote DMA */
> > > > -		if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_READ)
> > > > -			break;
> > > > -		if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM && chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE)
> > > > -			break;
> > > > -		return NULL;
> > > > -	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_CYCLIC) {
> > > >  		if (!xfer->xfer.cyclic.len || !xfer->xfer.cyclic.cnt)
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.24.0.rc1
> > > > 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux