Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: rz-dmac: Update compatible string
> for RZ/G2UL SoC
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 10:02 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Both RZ/G2UL and RZ/Five SoC's have SoC ID starting with R9A07G043.
> > To distinguish between them update the compatible string to
> > "renesas,r9a07g043u-dmac" for RZ/G2UL SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,rz-dmac.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,rz-dmac.yaml
> > @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ properties:
> > compatible:
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > - - renesas,r9a07g043-dmac # RZ/G2UL
> > - - renesas,r9a07g044-dmac # RZ/G2{L,LC}
> > - - renesas,r9a07g054-dmac # RZ/V2L
> > + - renesas,r9a07g043u-dmac # RZ/G2UL
>
> Is this really needed? As far as we know, RZ/Five and RZ/G2UL do use the
> same I/O blocks?
OK, Just thought their DEVID is different and they use RISC-V instead of ARM64
And also the CPU caches are different.
I agree it uses identical IP blocks.
May be I can drop this patch, if it is not really needed. Please let me know.
Cheers,
Biju
>
> > + - renesas,r9a07g044-dmac # RZ/G2{L,LC}
> > + - renesas,r9a07g054-dmac # RZ/V2L
> > - const: renesas,rz-dmac
> >
> > reg:
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-
> m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker.
> But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
