The commit in the Fixes: tag has changed the logic of the code and now it is likely that the probe will return an early success (0), even if not completely executed. This should lead to a crash or similar issue later on when the code accesses to some never allocated resources. Change the '!err' into a 'err' when checking if 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()' has failed or not. While at it, simplify the code and remove the "can't success code" related to 32 DMA mask. As stated in [1], 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent(DMA_BIT_MASK(64))' can't fail if 'dev->dma_mask' is non-NULL. And if it is NULL, it would fail for the same reason when tried with DMA_BIT_MASK(32). [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398 Fixes: ecb8c88bd31c ("dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c index 198f6cd8ac1b..cee7aa231d7b 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c @@ -187,17 +187,9 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, /* DMA configuration */ err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); - if (!err) { + if (err) { pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 64 set failed\n"); return err; - } else { - pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 64 set failed\n"); - - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); - if (err) { - pci_err(pdev, "DMA mask 32 set failed\n"); - return err; - } } /* Data structure allocation */ -- 2.30.2
