Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] dmaengine: acpi: Check for errors from acpi_register_gsi() separately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02-08-21, 20:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> While IRQ test agaist the returned variable in practice is a good enough
> there is still a room for theoretical mistake in case the vIRQ of the
> device contains the same error code that acpi_register_gsi() may return.
> Due to this, check for error code separately from matching the vIRQs.
> 
> Besides that, append documentation to tell why acpi_gsi_to_irq() can't
> be used and we call acpi_register_gsi() instead.

patch fails to apply, pls rebase

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c b/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c
> index 52768dc8ce12..5906eae26e2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/acpi-dma.c
> @@ -75,8 +75,16 @@ static int acpi_dma_parse_resource_group(const struct acpi_csrt_group *grp,
>  	    si->mmio_base_high != upper_32_bits(mem))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* Match device by Linux vIRQ */
> +	/*
> +	 * acpi_gsi_to_irq() can't be used because some platforms do not save
> +	 * registered IRQs in the MP table. Instead we just try to register
> +	 * the GSI, which is the core part of the above mentioned function.
> +	 */
>  	ret = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, si->gsi_interrupt, si->interrupt_mode, si->interrupt_polarity);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Match device by Linux vIRQ */
>  	if (ret != irq)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
~Vinod



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux