Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] dmaengine: ptdma: Initial driver for the AMD PTDMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:24:52AM +0530, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/16/2021 9:45 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > [CAUTION: External Email]
> > 
> > On 15-06-21, 16:50, Sanjay R Mehta wrote:
> > 
> >>>> +static struct pt_device *pt_alloc_struct(struct device *dev)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +     struct pt_device *pt;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     pt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pt), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     if (!pt)
> >>>> +             return NULL;
> >>>> +     pt->dev = dev;
> >>>> +     pt->ord = atomic_inc_return(&pt_ordinal);
> >>>
> >>> What is the use of this number?
> >>>
> >>
> >> There are eight similar instances of this DMA engine on AMD SOC.
> >> It is to differentiate each of these instances.
> > 
> > Are they individual device objects?
> > 
> 
> Yes, they are individual device objects.

Then what is "ord" for?  Why are you using an atomic variable for this?
What does this field do?  Why doesn't the normal way of naming a device
come into play here instead?

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux