On 15/06/21 20:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15-06-21, 06:36, Robin Gong wrote: > > On 15/06/21 14:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 15-06-21, 01:55, Robin Gong wrote: > > > > On 06/11/21 21:51 Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Without this series, SPI DMA does not work on i.MX8MM: > > > > > > > > > > [ 41.315984] spi_master spi1: I/O Error in DMA RX > > > > > > > > > > I applied your series and SPI DMA works now: > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks Fabio. > > > > Hello Vinod, Mark, > > > > Is my patch set good enough to merge? I remember someone else are > > > > requesting it from last year like Fabio. > > > > > > I have acked the last dmaengine patch, is there any else required from me? > > > Which tree will be this merged thru? > > Thanks Vinod, mainline is enough I think. > > I meant which subsystem tree will this go thru :) I thought the patches with 'spi' tag could be merged into spi tree while 'dmaengine' merged into dmaengine tree, the rest of dts patch merged into i.mx branch. But from HW errata view, maybe merging all into i.mx branch is a better way?
