On 6/9/2021 12:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
[snipped]
>> +static struct pt_dma_desc *pt_alloc_dma_desc(struct pt_dma_chan *chan,
>> + unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + struct pt_dma_desc *desc;
>> +
>> + desc = kmem_cache_zalloc(chan->pt->dma_desc_cache, GFP_NOWAIT);
>> + if (!desc)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + vchan_tx_prep(&chan->vc, &desc->vd, flags);
>> +
>> + desc->pt = chan->pt;
>> + desc->issued_to_hw = 0;
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&desc->cmdlist);
>
> why do you need your own list, the lists in vc should suffice?
>
Do you think this should be a major blocker for pulling this series in 5.14?
Would you be okay to accept this change in the subsequent driver updates?
>> +static int pt_resume(struct dma_chan *dma_chan)
>> +{
>> + struct pt_dma_chan *chan = to_pt_chan(dma_chan);
>> + struct pt_dma_desc *desc = NULL;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vc.lock, flags);
>> + pt_start_queue(&chan->pt->cmd_q);
>> + desc = __pt_next_dma_desc(chan);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vc.lock, flags);
>> +
>> + /* If there was something active, re-start */
>> + if (desc)
>> + pt_cmd_callback(desc, 0);
>
> this doesn't sound correct. In pause yoy stop the queue, so start of the
> queue should be done here... Why grab a descriptor?
>
>> +static int pt_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dma_chan)
>> +{
>> + struct pt_dma_chan *chan = to_pt_chan(dma_chan);
>> +
>> + vchan_free_chan_resources(&chan->vc);
>
> what about the descriptors, are you not going to clear the lists and
> free them..
>
>> +int pt_dmaengine_register(struct pt_device *pt)
>> +{
>> + struct pt_dma_chan *chan;
>> + struct dma_device *dma_dev = &pt->dma_dev;
>> + char *cmd_cache_name;
>> + char *desc_cache_name;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + pt->pt_dma_chan = devm_kzalloc(pt->dev, sizeof(*pt->pt_dma_chan),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pt->pt_dma_chan)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + cmd_cache_name = devm_kasprintf(pt->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>> + "%s-dmaengine-cmd-cache",
>> + pt->name);
>> + if (!cmd_cache_name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pt->dma_cmd_cache = kmem_cache_create(cmd_cache_name,
>> + sizeof(struct pt_dma_cmd),
>> + sizeof(void *),
>> + SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
>> + if (!pt->dma_cmd_cache)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + desc_cache_name = devm_kasprintf(pt->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>> + "%s-dmaengine-desc-cache",
>> + pt->name);
>> + if (!desc_cache_name) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_cache;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pt->dma_desc_cache = kmem_cache_create(desc_cache_name,
>> + sizeof(struct pt_dma_desc),
>> + sizeof(void *),
>
> sizeof void ptr?
>
>> + SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
>> + if (!pt->dma_desc_cache) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_cache;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dma_dev->dev = pt->dev;
>> + dma_dev->src_addr_widths = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES;
>> + dma_dev->dst_addr_widths = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES;
>> + dma_dev->directions = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM;
>> + dma_dev->residue_granularity = DMA_RESIDUE_GRANULARITY_DESCRIPTOR;
>> + dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dma_dev->cap_mask);
>> + dma_cap_set(DMA_INTERRUPT, dma_dev->cap_mask);
>> + dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, dma_dev->cap_mask);
>
> Why DMA_PRIVATE ? this is a dma mempcy controller ...
This DMA controller is intended to be used with AMD Non-Transparent
Bridge devices and not for general purpose peripheral DMA. Hence marking
it as DMA_PRIVATE.
- Sanjay
