Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: device cmd should use dedicated lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: device cmd should use dedicated lock
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:09:23 +0530
In-reply-to: <161894525685.3210132.16160045731436382560.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>
References: <161894525685.3210132.16160045731436382560.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>

On 20-04-21, 12:00, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Create a dedicated lock for device command operations. Put the device
> command operation under finer grained locking instead of using the
> idxd->dev_lock.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

References:
- [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: device cmd should use dedicated lock
  - From: Dave Jiang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: remove MSIX masking for interrupt handlers
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] dmaengine: idxd: IDXD pmu support
Previous by thread: [PATCH] dmaengine: idxd: device cmd should use dedicated lock
Next by thread: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: idxd: add interrupt handle request and release support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [Linux for Samsung SOC] [eCos] [Linux PCI] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites]

Powered by Linux