Hi Vinod,
On 4/21/2021 1:01 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 20-04-21, 09:13, Zanussi, Tom wrote:
Hi Vinod,
On 4/20/2021 6:11 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 03-04-21, 11:45, Tom Zanussi wrote:
+config INTEL_IDXD_PERFMON
+ bool "Intel Data Accelerators performance monitor support"
+ depends on INTEL_IDXD
+ default y
default y..?
Will change to n.
That is the default, you may drop this line
OK, will do.
/* IDXD software descriptor */
@@ -369,4 +399,19 @@ int idxd_cdev_get_major(struct idxd_device *idxd);
int idxd_wq_add_cdev(struct idxd_wq *wq);
void idxd_wq_del_cdev(struct idxd_wq *wq);
+/* perfmon */
+#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IDXD_PERFMON
maybe use IS_ENABLED()
?
Yes, I'll change to this.
@@ -556,6 +562,8 @@ static int __init idxd_init_module(void)
for (i = 0; i < IDXD_TYPE_MAX; i++)
idr_init(&idxd_idrs[i]);
+ perfmon_init();
+
err = idxd_register_bus_type();
if (err < 0)
return err;
@@ -589,5 +597,6 @@ static void __exit idxd_exit_module(void)
pci_unregister_driver(&idxd_pci_driver);
idxd_cdev_remove();
idxd_unregister_bus_type();
+ perfmon_exit();
Ideally would make sense to add perfmon module first and then add use in
idxd..
OK, I'll separate this out into a separate patch.
+static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf);
+
+static cpumask_t perfmon_dsa_cpu_mask;
+static bool cpuhp_set_up;
+static enum cpuhp_state cpuhp_slot;
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
Pls document these new attributes added
?
Yes, I'll add comments to all the attributes (also I'm assuming they don't need to be documented elsewhere).
+static int perfmon_collect_events(struct idxd_pmu *idxd_pmu,
+ struct perf_event *leader,
+ bool dogrp)
dogrp..?
Yeah, bad name, first thought on seeing it is always 'dog'. ;-)
Yep, that was my first read as well... i guess it would be better as
do_grp
Yep, will make change it to that.
Thanks,
Tom
