On 19-10-20, 12:04, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > one minor comment... > > On 15/10/2020 10.31, Vinod Koul wrote: > > dmaengine history has a non inclusive terminology of dmaengine slave, I > > feel it is time to replace that. > > > > This moves structures in dmaengine interface with replacement of slave > > to peripheral which is an appropriate term for dmaengine peripheral > > devices > > > > Since the change of name can break users, the new names have been added > > with old structs kept as macro define for new names. Once the users have > > been migrated, these macros will be dropped. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ... > > > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > > index f7f420876d21..04b993a5373c 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > > ... > > > /** > > - * struct dma_slave_map - associates slave device and it's slave channel with > > + * struct dma_peripheral_map - associates peripheral device and it's peripheral channel with > > * parameter to be used by a filter function > > * @devname: name of the device > > - * @slave: slave channel name > > + * @peripheral: peripheral channel name > > I know that this is slave -> peripheral change, but would not be better > to call this as 'channame'? okay have made in chan_name -- ~Vinod
