Hi Rob, On 30/09/2020 12.14, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > New binding document for > Texas Instruments K3 Block Copy DMA (BCDMA). > > BCDMA is introduced as part of AM64. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml | 183 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c84fb641738f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ ... > + compatible: > + enum: > + - ti,am64-dmss-bcdma Would it be OK if I use ti,am64x-dmss-bcdma or should I stick with am64-dmss-bcdma. The TRM refers to the family as AM64x, but having the 'x' in the compatible did not sounded right. - Péter Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
