On 22-09-20, 14:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> > > Andy reported that commit 6b41030fdc79 ("dmaengine: dmatest: > Restore default for channel") broke his scripts for the case > where "busy" channel is used for configuration with expectation > that run command would do nothing. Instead, behavior was > (unintentionally) changed to treat such case as under-configuration > and progress with defaults, i.e. run command would start a test > with default setting for channel (which would use all channels). > > Restore original behavior with tracking status of channel setter > so we can distinguish between misconfigured and under-configured > cases in run command and act accordingly. Applied all, thanks -- ~Vinod