On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:40 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03-06-20, 14:36, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
>
> s/fialure/failure
>
> > Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of
> > failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put_sync if
> > pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c
> > index 12f7637e13a1..ab250d7eed29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dmamux.c
> > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static void *stm32_dmamux_route_allocate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmamux->lock, flags);
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>
> why put_sync()
>
> > goto error;
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmamux->lock, flags);
> > @@ -340,8 +341,10 @@ static int stm32_dmamux_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > int i, ret;
> >
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
>
> here too
Is put_noidle() better?
>
> > return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < stm32_dmamux->dma_requests; i++)
> > stm32_dmamux->ccr[i] = stm32_dmamux_read(stm32_dmamux->iomem,
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> --
> ~Vinod
--
Navid.
