Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] dt-bindings: dma: dw: Convert DW DMAC to DT binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:43 AM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Modern device tree bindings are supposed to be created as YAML-files
> in accordance with dt-schema. This commit replaces the Synopsis
> Designware DMA controller legacy bare text bindings with YAML file.
> The only required prorties are "compatible", "reg", "#dma-cells" and
> "interrupts", which will be used by the driver to correctly find the
> controller memory region and handle its events. The rest of the properties
> are optional, since in case if either "dma-channels" or "dma-masters" isn't
> specified, the driver will attempt to auto-detect the IP core
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Rob, here are questions to you.

> +  dma-channels:
> +    description: |
> +      Number of DMA channels supported by the controller. In case if
> +      not specified the driver will try to auto-detect this and
> +      the rest of the optional parameters.
> +    minimum: 1
> +    maximum: 8

...

> +  multi-block:

> +      maxItems: 8

This maximum is defined by above dma-channels property. Is there any
way to put it in the schema?

...

> +  snps,dma-protection-control:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#definitions/uint32
> +    description: |
> +      Bits one-to-one passed to the AHB HPROT[3:1] bus. Each bit setting
> +      indicates the following features: bit 0 - privileged mode,
> +      bit 1 - DMA is bufferable, bit 2 - DMA is cacheable.
> +    default: 0
> +    minimum: 0
> +    maximum: 7

AFAIR this is defined by bit flags, does schema have a mechanism to
define flags-like entries?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux