Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: dma: renesas,usb-dmac: convert bindings to json-schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shimoda-san,

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Convert Renesas R-Car USB-DMA Controller bindings documentation
> to json-schema.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,usb-dmac.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/renesas,usb-dmac.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Renesas USB DMA Controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - renesas,r8a7743-usb-dmac  # RZ/G1M
> +          - renesas,r8a7744-usb-dmac  # RZ/G1N
> +          - renesas,r8a7745-usb-dmac  # RZ/G1E
> +          - renesas,r8a77470-usb-dmac # RZ/G1C
> +          - renesas,r8a774a1-usb-dmac # RZ/G2M
> +          - renesas,r8a774b1-usb-dmac # RZ/G2N
> +          - renesas,r8a774c0-usb-dmac # RZ/G2E
> +          - renesas,r8a7790-usb-dmac  # R-Car H2
> +          - renesas,r8a7791-usb-dmac  # R-Car M2-W
> +          - renesas,r8a7793-usb-dmac  # R-Car M2-N
> +          - renesas,r8a7794-usb-dmac  # R-Car E2
> +          - renesas,r8a7795-usb-dmac  # R-Car H3
> +          - renesas,r8a7796-usb-dmac  # R-Car M3-W
> +          - renesas,r8a77961-usb-dmac # R-Car M3-W+
> +          - renesas,r8a77965-usb-dmac # R-Car M3-N
> +          - renesas,r8a77990-usb-dmac # R-Car E3
> +          - renesas,r8a77995-usb-dmac # R-Car D3
> +      - const: renesas,usb-dmac
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 2

Is there a use case for specifying a single interrupt?

> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    items:
> +      - pattern: "^ch[0-1]$"
> +      - pattern: "^ch[0-1]$"

Would it make sense to list the (two) actual channel names instead?

> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  '#dma-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +    description:
> +      The cell specifies the channel number of the DMAC port connected to
> +      the DMA client.
> +
> +  dma-channels:
> +    maximum: 2

Is there a use case for specifying a single channel?

> +
> +  iommus:
> +    maxItems: 2

Likewise?

> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  resets:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - interrupt-names
> +  - clocks
> +  - '#dma-cells'
> +  - dma-channels

Shouldn't "power-domains" and "resets" be mandatory, too?
All covered SoCS have them.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux