On 2020/03/10 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:27:41AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote: > > On 2020/03/10 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:31:55PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote: > > > > writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL); > > > > > > > > @@ -612,12 +613,14 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer(struct > > > > spi_imx_data *spi_imx, > > > > > > > > static void mx51_setup_wml(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) { > > > > + u32 tx_wml = 0; > > > > + > > > > /* > > > > * Configure the DMA register: setup the watermark > > > > * and enable DMA request. > > > > */ > > > > writel(MX51_ECSPI_DMA_RX_WML(spi_imx->wml - 1) | > > > > - MX51_ECSPI_DMA_TX_WML(spi_imx->wml) | > > > > + MX51_ECSPI_DMA_TX_WML(tx_wml) | > > > > > > tx_wml is never assigned any other value than 0. Drop the variable. > > That's prepared for 07/13 patch which may assign spi_imx->wml to tx_wml. > > Then this belongs into patch 7, right? Okay, understood your concern. Then I'll drop tx_wml to make it clear. > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König > | > Industrial Linux Solutions | > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.p > engutronix.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cyibin.gong%40nxp.com%7Cca6f14 > 28f4224fa79f1d08d7c4ce4a41%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0 > %7C0%7C637194262606339591&sdata=kI9HAyC%2FG3qmrIrLmfUDJ7dac > %2FOEDBtDm4oeRyak1xE%3D&reserved=0 |