On 03-02-20, 12:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > dma_request_slave_channel_reason() no longer have user in mainline, it > > can be removed. > > > > Advise users of dma_request_slave_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() to move to dma_request_slave_chan() > > How? There are legacy ARM boards you have to care / remove before. > DMAengine subsystem makes a p*s off decisions without taking care of > (I'm talking now about dma release callback, for example) end users. Can you elaborate issue you are seeing with dma_release callback? -- ~Vinod
