On 22-01-20, 15:10, Vinod Koul wrote: > I like the idea of adding this in debugfs and giving more info, I would > actually love to add bytes_transferred and few more info (descriptors > submitted etc) to it... > > > > This way we will have all the information in one place, easy to look up > > > and you don't need to manage symlinks dynamically, just check all > > > channels if they have slave_device/name when they are in_use (in_use w/o > > > slave_device is 'non slave') > > > > > > Some drivers are requesting and releasing the DMA channel per transfer > > > or when they are opened/closed or other variations. > > > > > > > What do other people think? > > > > Vinod: do you have some guidance for your minions? ;-) > > > That said, I am not against merging this patch while we add more > (debugfs)... So do my minions agree or they have better ideas :-) So no new ideas, I am going to apply this and queue for 5.6, something is better than nothing. And I am looking forward for debugfs to give better picture, volunteers? -- ~Vinod
