On 14/01/2020 21:02, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 14.01.2020 18:15, Jon Hunter пишет: >> >> On 12/01/2020 17:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> The ISR tasklet could be kept scheduled after DMA transfer termination, >>> let's add synchronization callback which blocks until tasklet is finished. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >>> index 319f31d27014..664e9c5df3ba 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c >>> @@ -798,6 +798,13 @@ static int tegra_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dc) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> +static void tegra_dma_synchronize(struct dma_chan *dc) >>> +{ >>> + struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc = to_tegra_dma_chan(dc); >>> + >>> + tasklet_kill(&tdc->tasklet); >>> +} >>> + >> >> Wouldn't there need to be some clean-up here? If the tasklet is >> scheduled, seems that there would be some other house-keeping that needs >> to be done after killing it. > > I'm not seeing anything to clean-up, could you please clarify? Clean-up with regard to the descriptors. I was concerned if you will the tasklet the necessary clean-up of the descriptors is not handled. Jon -- nvpublic