Hi Paul,
On 2019年10月24日 00:08, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Hi Zhou,
Le mer., oct. 23, 2019 at 15:02, Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
Add support for probing the dma-jz4780 driver on the X1000 Soc.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c
index cafb1cc0..f809a6e 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dma-jz4780.c
@@ -1019,11 +1019,18 @@ static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data
jz4780_dma_soc_data = {
.flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_ALLOW_LEGACY_DT |
JZ_SOC_DATA_PROGRAMMABLE_DMA,
};
+static const struct jz4780_dma_soc_data x1000_dma_soc_data = {
+ .nb_channels = 8,
+ .transfer_ord_max = 7,
+ .flags = JZ_SOC_DATA_ALLOW_LEGACY_DT |
JZ_SOC_DATA_PROGRAMMABLE_DMA,
Please don't use JZ_SOC_DATA_ALLOW_LEGACY_DT for new bindings.
With that flag removed:
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'll remove it in v2.
Best regards!
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id jz4780_dma_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-dma", .data =
&jz4740_dma_soc_data },
{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-dma", .data =
&jz4725b_dma_soc_data },
{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-dma", .data =
&jz4770_dma_soc_data },
{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-dma", .data =
&jz4780_dma_soc_data },
+ { .compatible = "ingenic,x1000-dma", .data = &x1000_dma_soc_data },
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, jz4780_dma_dt_match);
--
2.7.4
