Hi Anders && Viod, I sent v6 patch to fix the build error, please check. Patchwork link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/list/?series=191397 Best Regards, Peng >-----Original Message----- >From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: 2019年10月22日 17:27 >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx> >Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; Leo Li ><leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [V5 1/2] dmaengine: fsl-dpaa2-qdma: Add the >DPDMAI(Data Path DMA Interface) support > >Caution: EXT Email > >On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 08:16, Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Vinod, >> >> Thanks very much for your reply. >> >> Best Regards, >> Peng >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >Sent: 2019年10月17日 12:11 >> >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx> >> >Cc: dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; >> >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >Subject: [EXT] Re: [V5 1/2] dmaengine: fsl-dpaa2-qdma: Add the >> >DPDMAI(Data Path DMA Interface) support >> > >> >Caution: EXT Email >> > >> >On 30-09-19, 02:04, Peng Ma wrote: >> >> The MC(Management Complex) exports the DPDMAI(Data Path DMA >> >Interface) >> >> object as an interface to operate the DPAA2(Data Path Acceleration >> >> Architecture 2) qDMA Engine. The DPDMAI enables sending frame-based >> >> requests to qDMA and receiving back confirmation response on >> >> transaction completion, utilizing the DPAA2 QBMan(Queue Manager and >> >> Buffer Manager >> >> hardware) infrastructure. DPDMAI object provides up to two >> >> priorities for processing qDMA requests. >> >> The following list summarizes the DPDMAI main features and capabilities: >> >> 1. Supports up to two scheduling priorities for processing >> >> service requests. >> >> - Each DPDMAI transmit queue is mapped to one of two service >> >> priorities, allowing further prioritization in hardware between >> >> requests from different DPDMAI objects. >> >> 2. Supports up to two receive queues for incoming transaction >> >> completion confirmations. >> >> - Each DPDMAI receive queue is mapped to one of two receive >> >> priorities, allowing further prioritization between other >> >> interfaces when associating the DPDMAI receive queues to DPIO >> >> or DPCON(Data Path Concentrator) objects. >> >> 3. Supports different scheduling options for processing received >> >> packets: >> >> - Queues can be configured either in 'parked' mode (default), >> >> or attached to a DPIO object, or attached to DPCON object. >> >> 4. Allows interaction with one or more DPIO objects for >> >> dequeueing/enqueueing frame descriptors(FD) and for >> >> acquiring/releasing buffers. >> >> 5. Supports enable, disable, and reset operations. >> >> >> >> Add dpdmai to support some platforms with dpaa2 qdma engine. >> > >> >Applied both, thanks > >I see this error when I'm building. > >WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in >drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpdmai.o >see include/linux/module.h for more information >ERROR: "dpdmai_enable" [drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] >undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_set_rx_queue" >[drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_get_tx_queue" >[drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_get_rx_queue" >[drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_get_attributes" >[drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_open" [drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] >undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_close" [drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] >undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_disable" [drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] >undefined! >ERROR: "dpdmai_reset" [drivers/dma/fsl-dpaa2-qdma/dpaa2-qdma.ko] >undefined! >make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.modpost:95: __modpost] Error 1 >make[1]: *** [/srv/src/kernel/next/Makefile:1282: modules] Error 2 >make: *** [Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2 >make: Target 'Image' not remade because of errors. >make: Target 'modules' not remade because of errors. > >any other that see the same ? > >Cheers, >Anders
