RE: [PATCH] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix __iomem type confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:1:1, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:53 AM Gustavo Pimentel
> <Gustavo.Pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >
> > >  static struct dentry                         *base_dir;
> > >  static struct dw_edma                                *dw;
> > > -static struct dw_edma_v0_regs                        *regs;
> > > +static struct dw_edma_v0_regs                        __iomem *regs;
> >
> > Shouldn't the __iomem be next to dw_edma_v0_regs instead of the variable
> > name? I saw other drivers putting the __iomem next to the variable type,
> > therefore I assume it's the typical coding style.
> 
> Yes, that seems more common indeed. Do you want to fix up
> both patches yourself when you apply them or should I send a new version?

If you could do that, it will be great.
Thanks.

> 
>          Arnd






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux