On 2019-05-27 at 09:08 +0000, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:51:15PM +0800, yibin.gong@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > > From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx> > > > > The next v3 i.mx7ulp edma is based on v1, so change version > > check logic for v2 instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > --------- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma- > > common.c > > index bb24251..45d70d3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c > > @@ -657,26 +657,26 @@ void fsl_edma_setup_regs(struct > > fsl_edma_engine *edma) > > edma->regs.erql = edma->membase + EDMA_ERQ; > > edma->regs.eeil = edma->membase + EDMA_EEI; > > > > - edma->regs.serq = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_SERQ : EDMA64_SERQ); > > - edma->regs.cerq = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_CERQ : EDMA64_CERQ); > > - edma->regs.seei = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_SEEI : EDMA64_SEEI); > > - edma->regs.ceei = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_CEEI : EDMA64_CEEI); > > - edma->regs.cint = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_CINT : EDMA64_CINT); > > - edma->regs.cerr = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_CERR : EDMA64_CERR); > > - edma->regs.ssrt = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_SSRT : EDMA64_SSRT); > > - edma->regs.cdne = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_CDNE : EDMA64_CDNE); > > - edma->regs.intl = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_INTR : EDMA64_INTL); > > - edma->regs.errl = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v1) ? > > - EDMA_ERR : EDMA64_ERRL); > > + edma->regs.serq = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_SERQ : EDMA_SERQ); > > + edma->regs.cerq = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_CERQ : EDMA_CERQ); > > + edma->regs.seei = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_SEEI : EDMA_SEEI); > > + edma->regs.ceei = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_CEEI : EDMA_CEEI); > > + edma->regs.cint = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_CINT : EDMA_CINT); > > + edma->regs.cerr = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_CERR : EDMA_CERR); > > + edma->regs.ssrt = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_SSRT : EDMA_SSRT); > > + edma->regs.cdne = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_CDNE : EDMA_CDNE); > > + edma->regs.intl = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_INTL : EDMA_INTR); > > + edma->regs.errl = edma->membase + ((edma->version == v2) ? > > + EDMA64_ERRL : EDMA_ERR); > Following to what I have said to 6/7 you can put the register offsets > into that new struct aswell. > > Sascha Understood your point, but the logic of fsl-edma-common.c is the common functions array provided to be called in fsl-edma.c or mcf-edma.c, not different specific functions in fsl-edma.c or mcf-edma.c. >
