On 07-05-19, 09:16, Robin Gong wrote:
> Because the number of ecspi1 rx event on i.mx8mm is 0, the condition
> check ignore such special case without dma channel enabled, which caused
> ecspi1 rx works failed. Actually, no need to check event_id0, checking
> event_id1 is enough for DEV_2_DEV case because it's so lucky that event_id1
> never be 0.
Well is that by chance or design that event_id1 will be never 0?
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index a495c7f..86594fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -1370,8 +1370,8 @@ static void sdma_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>
> sdma_channel_synchronize(chan);
>
> - if (sdmac->event_id0)
> - sdma_event_disable(sdmac, sdmac->event_id0);
> + sdma_event_disable(sdmac, sdmac->event_id0);
> +
> if (sdmac->event_id1)
> sdma_event_disable(sdmac, sdmac->event_id1);
>
> @@ -1670,11 +1670,9 @@ static int sdma_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
> memcpy(&sdmac->slave_config, dmaengine_cfg, sizeof(*dmaengine_cfg));
>
> /* Set ENBLn earlier to make sure dma request triggered after that */
> - if (sdmac->event_id0) {
> - if (sdmac->event_id0 >= sdmac->sdma->drvdata->num_events)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - sdma_event_enable(sdmac, sdmac->event_id0);
> - }
> + if (sdmac->event_id0 >= sdmac->sdma->drvdata->num_events)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + sdma_event_enable(sdmac, sdmac->event_id0);
>
> if (sdmac->event_id1) {
> if (sdmac->event_id1 >= sdmac->sdma->drvdata->num_events)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
~Vinod
