On 29-04-19, 20:20, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 19:57, Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 15-04-19, 20:14, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > From: Eric Long <eric.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Since we can support multiple DMA engine controllers, we should add
> > > device validation in filter function to check if the correct controller
> > > to be requested.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Long <eric.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c | 5 +++++
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > index 0f92e60..9f99d4b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/sprd-dma.c
> > > @@ -1020,8 +1020,13 @@ static void sprd_dma_free_desc(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
> > > static bool sprd_dma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> > > {
> > > struct sprd_dma_chn *schan = to_sprd_dma_chan(chan);
> > > + struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec =
> > > + container_of(param, struct of_phandle_args, args[0]);
> > > u32 slave_id = *(u32 *)param;
> > >
> > > + if (chan->device->dev->of_node != dma_spec->np)
> >
> > Are you not using of_dma_find_controller() that does this, so this would
> > be useless!
>
> Yes, we can use of_dma_find_controller(), but that will be a little
> complicated than current solution. Since we need introduce one
> structure to save the node to validate in the filter function like
> below, which seems make things complicated. But if you still like to
> use of_dma_find_controller(), I can change to use it in next version.
Sorry I should have clarified more..
of_dma_find_controller() is called by xlate, so you already run this
check, so why use this :)
--
~Vinod
