On 18-02-19, 08:34, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 2/18/19 8:28 AM, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-02-16 at 17:03 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > >> > > > > My bad here. > > I took this patch from our kernel tree and sent it. > > I assumed it works, since it works in our tree. > > I'll take a look and see about the order of patches, and which one(s) > > need(s) to be sent before this one > > https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/linux/commit/414a555896b2abca3518c3c878f21e7b1ea95904#diff-b5b2fd5430b4f9aff1ae97bae60dd5c5 > > That patch was sent upstream, not sure why it was never merged. > > But if necessary you can also re-write this patch to not rely on the > other one. Or send this patch upstream if you find it very useful :) -- ~Vinod
