On 24-12-18, 05:29, Peng Ma wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Oh, I did not see the in_XX64/out_XX64 supported only __powerpc64__ just now.
> Thanks for your reminder.
Can you send the formal patch for this...
FWIW, fsl patches were not merged last cycle because of reported
regression...
>
> #ifdef __powerpc64__
>
> #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
> DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_be64, 64, std);
> DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_be64, 64, ld);
>
> /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */
> static inline u64 in_le64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr)
> {
> return swab64(in_be64(addr));
> }
>
> static inline void out_le64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val)
> {
> out_be64(addr, swab64(val));
> }
> #else
> DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_le64, 64, std);
> DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_le64, 64, ld);
>
> /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */
> static inline u64 in_be64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr)
> {
> return swab64(in_le64(addr));
> }
>
> static inline void out_be64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val)
> {
> out_le64(addr, swab64(val));
> }
>
> #endif
> #endif /* __powerpc64__ */
>
> Best Regards,
> Peng
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Scott Wood <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: 2018年12月24日 12:46
> >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Zhang Wei
> ><zw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wen He
> ><wen.he_1@xxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for
> >powerpc64
> >
> >On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 03:42 +0000, Peng Ma wrote:
> >> Hi Scott,
> >>
> >> You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it as
> >> fallows:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index
> >> 88db939..057babf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h
> >> @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan {
> >> #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v)
> >> #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v)
> >>
> >> -#ifndef __powerpc64__
> >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{
> >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr);
> >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32;
> >> -
> >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{
> >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32);
> >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{
> >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr);
> >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32;
> >> -
> >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1));
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{
> >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32);
> >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val);
> >> -}
> >> -#endif
> >> +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p)
> >> +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p)
> >> +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v)
> >> +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v)
> >> #endif
> >
> >Then you'll break 32-bit, assuming those fake-it-with-two-32-bit-accesses
> >were actually needed.
> >
> >-Scott
> >
>
--
~Vinod
