Hi Vinod,
Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 15:32, Vinod <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On 21-07-18, 13:06, Paul Cercueil wrote:
+static inline void jz4780_dma_chan_enable(struct jz4780_dma_dev
*jzdma,
+ unsigned int chn)
right justified and aligned with preceding please. While adding new
code to a existing driver it is a good idea to conform to existing
style
Well that's exactly what I did, this is the style used in the DMA
driver,
so I tried to conform to it.
+{
+ if (jzdma->version == ID_JZ4770)
+ jz4780_dma_ctrl_writel(jzdma, JZ_DMA_REG_DCKES, BIT(chn));
+}
+
+static inline void jz4780_dma_chan_disable(struct jz4780_dma_dev
*jzdma,
+ unsigned int chn)
+{
+ if (jzdma->version == ID_JZ4770)
+ jz4780_dma_ctrl_writel(jzdma, JZ_DMA_REG_DCKEC, BIT(chn));
so if another version has this feature we would do:
if (jzdma->version == ID_JZ4770) ||
if (jzdma->version == ID_JZXXXX))
and so on.. why not add a value, clk_enable in the description and use
that. For each controller it is set to true or false
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html