On 29-06-18, 09:46, Andrea Merello wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Vinod <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> +
> >> + if ((copy + sg_used < period_len) &&
> >> + chan->xdev->common.copy_align) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * If this is not the last descriptor, make sure
> >> + * the next one will be properly aligned
> >> + */
> >> + copy = rounddown(copy,
> >> + (1 << chan->xdev->common.copy_align));
> >> + }
> >
> > same code pasted twice, can we have a routine for this... perhaps more
> > code can be made common too
>
> Yes, I see.. Indeed there was duplicated code before this series and
> it is still there after it.
>
> I can see if we can have a routine as you suggested at least for the
> code portions touched by this patch. Do you eventually want this extra
> change to be done in the same patch 1/5 or do you want a separate
> patch i.e. 2/6 or 6/6 ?
Each patch should do one thing, so would make sense to move first and
then add you on top of that. 1/6 commonize and 2/6 add this bit.
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
