Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: add ColdFire mcf5441x edma support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22-06-18, 11:44, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EP93XX_DMA) += ep93xx_dma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_DMA) += fsldma.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_EDMA) += fsl-edma.o fsl-edma-common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MCF_EDMA) += mcf-edma.o fsl-edma-common.o

that makes kernel have two copies of common.o one in thsi driver and one
in previous one why not do:

CONFIG_FSL_COMMON += fsl-edma-common.o
CONFIG_FSL_EDMA += fsl-edma.o
CONFIG_MCF_EDMA += mcf-edma.o

and you select CONFIG_FSL_COMMON in both FSL and MCF Kconfig?

> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
> +// Copyright (c) 2017 Sysam, Angelo Dureghello  <angelo@xxxxxxxx>
> +/*
> + * drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c
> + *
> + * Driver for the Freescale ColdFire 64-ch eDMA implementation,
> + * derived from drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute  it and/or modify it
> + * under  the terms of  the GNU General  Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + */

again, no need for text

> +static irqreturn_t mcf_edma_tx_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct fsl_edma_engine *mcf_edma = dev_id;
> +	struct edma_regs *regs = &mcf_edma->regs;
> +	unsigned int ch;
> +	struct fsl_edma_chan *mcf_chan;
> +	u64 intmap;
> +
> +	intmap = ioread32(regs->inth);
> +	intmap <<= 32;
> +	intmap |= ioread32(regs->intl);
> +	if (!intmap)
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +	for (ch = 0; ch < mcf_edma->n_chans; ch++) {
> +		if (intmap & (0x1 << ch)) {

                intmap & BIT(ch)

> +static irqreturn_t mcf_edma_err_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct fsl_edma_engine *mcf_edma = dev_id;
> +	struct edma_regs *regs = &mcf_edma->regs;
> +	unsigned int err, ch;
> +
> +	err = ioread32(regs->errl);
> +	if (!err)
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> +	for (ch = 0; ch < (EDMA_CHANNELS / 2); ch++) {
> +		if (err & (0x1 << ch)) {

here as well

> +static int mcf_edma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct fsl_edma_engine *mcf_edma = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	fsl_edma_cleanup_vchan(&mcf_edma->dma_dev);
> +	dma_async_device_unregister(&mcf_edma->dma_dev);

at this point your irqs are still registered and running. You vchan
tasklet maybe still pending to be eecuted and can be scheduled again

> +static int __init mcf_edma_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&mcf_edma_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(mcf_edma_init);

why subsys_initcall?

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux