Okay, I'll try to split it.
On 三, 2018-05-23 at 19:04 +0530, Vinod wrote:
> On 23-05-18, 12:56, s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, it's somewhat related to virtual dma support, but that's not
> > my
> > point. My point is that this patch is quite big and thus hard to
> > review.
> > If we find ways to make it smaller and to split it up in multiple
> > patches then we should do so, because it makes it easier to review
> > and
> > in case you break something here we raise the chance that a "git
> > bisect"
> > lands on a smaller patch which is easier to understand.
> >
> > Please try and make that a separate change. I haven't really looked
> > into
> > it and it may not be possible due to reasons I haven't seen, but
> > please
> > at least give it a try.
> That is something would help me as well. I have reviewed the patch
> and am not
> sure I fully understand the changes, so breaking up stuff would
> definitely help
> in the review..
> ��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
