Re: Regarding patch: dmaengine: remove DMA_SG as it is dead code in kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/17/2018 5:21 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> Given we have few users of DMA Engine, I believe we should try to keep as
>> much functionality as possible in the kernel to allow new features to be
>> developed rather than limiting people's choices.
>>
> Would love to see more in kernel consumers for dmaengine. Maybe things
> that help accelerate core kernel bits? :)
> 

Side conversation...

I'm on the same boat. I have been thinking about this for some time.
I also know that Intel maintains a repo in sourceforge for experimental
work that was never upstreamed.

What kind of things could be useful for DMA engine optimization?

I was told that most of the kernel data structures are resident and cannot
be paged but then I hear about kernel virtual memory allocated by vmalloc
that it makes me nervous. 

What worked until now and what failed?

I understand that pinning pages is the biggest challenge. What else?

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux