> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 13:46 > To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx> > > > +static int amba_dma_configure(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + return dma_common_configure(dev); > > +} > > So it turns out we only end with two callers of dma_common_configure > after this series. Based ont hat I'm tempted with the suggestion > from Robin to just have amba call platform_dma_configure, and move > the code from dma_common_configure to platform_dma_configure. okay, that would be fine, trivial query - will it be okay to include 'linux/platform_device.h' in the AMBA bus? I am reluctant for this change because of including platform file. Thanks, Nipun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
