As well as its sibling of_device_get_match_data() has no such checks,
no need to do it in acpi_get_match_data().
First of all, we are not supposed to call fwnode API like this without
driver attached.
Second, since __acpi_match_device() does check input parameter there is
no need to duplicate it outside.
And last but not least one, the API should still serve the cases when
ACPI device is enumerated via PRP0001. In such case driver has neither
ACPI table nor driver data there.
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index f1384e107eed..ca4af098b1bf 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -834,12 +834,6 @@ void *acpi_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
{
const struct acpi_device_id *match;
- if (!dev->driver)
- return NULL;
-
- if (!dev->driver->acpi_match_table)
- return NULL;
-
match = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, dev);
if (!match)
return NULL;
--
2.15.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
