RE: DMA_SG removed : How to support M2M on userspace allocated buffers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Agree! To enable DMA_SG in the dmaengine framework we need 
to have its consumer first. We will recommend same to xilinx users 
and hope to see some real usecase getting upstreamed :)

Thanks,
Radhey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul [mailto:vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 9:39 AM
> To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Appana
> Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: DMA_SG removed : How to support M2M on userspace allocated
> buffers?
> 
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:38:17PM +0000, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In kernel upgrade 4.14 DMA_SG is removed from DMA framework since it
> > was a dead code and having no consumers in the kernel.
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg13835.html
> >
> > However, there are some xilinx customers using this feature out of the
> > tree and are dependent on DMA_SG. Removing DMA_SG from framework will
> > break such use cases i.e doing memory to memory transfer on userspace
> > allocated (malloc) buffers.
> >
> > What is the recommendation from the community on supporting above
> > usecase?
> 
> Submit a driver along with this feature, its that simple :)
> 
> --
> ~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux