On 11/13/2017 9:01 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 11/13/17 6:52 AM, Adam Wallis wrote: >> Hmm, I think I would need to submit a v2 of this patch removing the >> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx since this is dependent on my WARN patch in dma >> linux-next tree...however, I don't know what the SHA of that patch will be until >> it's in Linus' tree. >> >> Any thoughts on that Vinod? > > You can specify prerequisite patches in patches for the stable tree. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.13/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > Yep, that's what I was referring to in my email. The form of Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle specifies a dependent SHA, which I don't yet know since Linus hasn't pulled Vinod's tree. Unless I am missing something? -- Adam Wallis Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
