On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 03:01:28 EEST Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>> >>> Anyway, in all case I can use TCRB in v3 patch,
>> >>> and it needs abouve explanation.
>> >> If so, I think v1 is enough... ?
>> >> "transfer completed count is important for all case" is no doubt... ?
>> >
>> > That's correct, but I don't think the explanation was detailed and clear
>> > enough. If it was Geert wouldn't have asked for a v2, and you wouldn't
>> > have
>> > agreed to his request :-)
>>
>> OK. Let's follow Vinod's decision.
>>
>> Vinod, I'm happy if you are OK on v1.
>> And I'm happy to create v3 patch which includes detail reason
>> which is explained by Laurent if you want.
>
> I'd be happier with v3 :-)
+1
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
