On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:21:02PM +0000, Brüns, Stefan wrote: > On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 09:02:17 CEST Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:49:24AM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote: > > > To avoid introduction of a new compatible for each small SoC/DMA > > > controller > > > variation, move the definition of the channel count to the devicetree. > > > > > > The number of vchans is no longer explicit, but limited by the highest > > > port/DMA request number. The result is a slight overallocation for SoCs > > > with a sparse port mapping. > > > > This doesnt apply for me, please check > > The hunk below fails after https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ > vkoul/slave-dma.git/commit/?h=topic/ > sun&id=8f3b00347bf075fb457f90ce76573615f567e7bc > , which removed the "const struct of_device_id *device;" declaration. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > > index 7fce976a13d8..b5906da2a975 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c > > @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ > .. > > @@ -1155,6 +1159,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun6i_dma_match); > > static int sun6i_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > const struct of_device_id *device; > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > struct sun6i_dma_dev *sdc; > > struct resource *res; > > int ret, i; > > Can you fix this up, or should I send a new version of this patch? rebased one please -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
