On Montag, 4. September 2017 01:44:54 CEST André Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/09/17 23:40, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> > To avoid introduction of a new compatible for each small SoC/DMA
> > controller
> > variation, move the definition of the channel count to the devicetree.
> >
> > The number of vchans is no longer explicit, but limited by the highest
> > port/DMA request number. The result is a slight overallocation for SoCs
> > with a sparse port mapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> > index c69dadb853d2..bd4c2e4a759b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
> >
> > #define DMA_STAT 0x30
> >
> > +/* Offset between DMA_IRQ_EN and DMA_IRQ_STAT limits number of channels
> > */
> > +#define DMA_MAX_CHANNELS (DMA_IRQ_CHAN_NR * 0x10 / 4)
> > +
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * sun8i specific registers
> > */
> >
> > @@ -65,7 +68,8 @@
> >
> > #define DMA_CHAN_LLI_ADDR 0x08
> >
> > #define DMA_CHAN_CUR_CFG 0x0c
> >
> > -#define DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_DRQ(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
> > +#define DMA_CHAN_MAX_DRQ 0x1f
> > +#define DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_DRQ(x) ((x) & DMA_CHAN_MAX_DRQ)
> >
> > #define DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_IO_MODE BIT(5)
> > #define DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_LINEAR_MODE (0 << 5)
> > #define DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_BURST_A31(x) (((x) & 0x3) << 7)
> >
> > @@ -1173,6 +1177,35 @@ static int sun6i_dma_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)>
> > sdc->num_vchans = sdc->cfg->nr_max_vchans;
> > sdc->max_request = sdc->cfg->nr_max_requests;
> >
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-channels", &sdc->num_pchans);
> > + if (ret && !sdc->num_pchans) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get dma-channels.\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (sdc->num_pchans > DMA_MAX_CHANNELS) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Number of dma-channels out of range.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-requests", &sdc->max_request);
> > + if (ret && !sdc->max_request) {
> > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Missing dma-requests, using %u.\n",
> > + DMA_CHAN_MAX_DRQ);
>
> Mmmh, is this mapping of "!sdc->max_request" -> DMA_CHAN_MAX_DRQ
> implemented somewhere else? Or is it just missing here:
> sdc->max_request = DMA_CHAN_MAX_DRQ;
Well spotted, that assignment is actually missing.
With this line added, your comment for patch 8/10 should also be addressed
(regarding the default value).
> Otherwise this is looking good, thanks for picking up the DT property
> approach!
>
> Cheers,
> Andre.
>
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
